What Will Determine if History Records COVID-19 as a Global Bioweapon Attack or Vaccination Program?
Presidents and military generals claim that they attempt to avoid kinetic military wars, specifically nuclear, through secret negotiations. What if the compromise to nuclear war is global biowarfare?
If you’re interested on how the Pentagon determines the difference between a bioweapon and a vaccine, this article is a must read.
November 10, 2025: In a jaw-dropping interview with Dana Parish from Third Opinion, former CDC Director, Dr. Robert Redfield, openly expresses his expert opinion that the entire COVID-19 program was intended to make, “a self-spreading, aerosolized respiratory transmitted vaccine.” (not a bioweapon)
“I actually don’t think the Chinese or were intentionally trying to create a bioweapon. Some people disagree with me. I think they were trying intentionally to develop a biodefense weapon.
That they were trying to develop a vector that could be used to vaccinate the Chinese military, the Chinese people, and maybe beyond…
I have some people that strongly disagree with me because they think there may have been more bioweapon intent.
“And that’s why they wanted a vector that could be transmitted by air assault (aerosol) or by air and droplets, because they really didn’t want to have to use needles and vaccinate everybody.” - Dr. Redfield
“They wanted a vector that when you did get infected you didn’t get sick. So, it was intentionally manipulated to be asymptomatic.” - Dr. Redfield
“And I think, again, that’s why the interferon response elements were knocked out of this virus. I think that was all engineered.
And then they wanted a virus, a vector that could be used over and over and over again (for other viruses).” -Dr. Redfield
“So, they didn’t want the human to develop the protective immune response that would then not allow that vector to be used again.”- Dr. Redfield
“And I think that’s why, if you look and again, at some of the changes in the virus, it was engineered in a way that it doesn’t develop an immunodominant response.”
“And we knew this pretty early on in the COVID pandemic that I had patients that were getting their second episode of COVID within three or four months after the first episode. So that told me that even natural infection didn’t prevent reinfection. And all of that was engineered, in my view, intentionally.” - Dr. Redfield
Avoiding World War III Amidst Accusations of U.S. and China COVID-19 Bioweapons Use
Presidents, military generals, and intelligence officials from around the globe frequently claim that they attempt to avoid kinetic military wars through negotiations, specifically the avoidance of the use of nuclear weapons and biowarfare attacks.
March 2022: Russia Accuses Pentagon of Violating the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) Treaty
Throughout 2022 -2024, the late Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, head of the Radiation, Chemical, and Biological Defense Troops of the Russian Armed Forces, presented documents exposing the US-Pentagon bioweapons labs in the US, China and Ukraine, including the development of biosynthetic pathogens such as ‘Marburg fever, Lassa fever, anthrax, cholera, African swine fever, pathogenic avian influenza (H5N1), foot-and-mouth disease, and COVID-19.’
January 2023: Russia Calls for Global Cooperation to Reconcile the Economic Loss and Loss of Lives Due to COVID-19
In January of 2023, the Russian foreign ministry issued a statement incriminating the WHO and US BioPharma companies as part of a reckless global ‘COVID-19 vaccination’ program that caused a sharp increase in diseases that could be treated by US BioPharma companies’ prescription products.
The Russian foreign minister called for, “cooperation with all countries on the principles of solidarity, equality and respect for international law in the search for mutually acceptable solutions.”
August 2024: Russia Accuses the U.S. of Creating Ethnically Targeted Bioweapons
In August 2024, General Kirillov brought forth new allegations, accusing the US of, “creating biological agents capable of selectively affecting various ethnic groups of the population.”
What’s the difference between a mRNA nanoparticle bioweapon and a mRNA nanoparticle vaccine? INTENT.
Throughout 2022 and 2023, I received tremendous pushback for asserting that COVID-19 was not caused by a ‘virus’, but by aerosolized nanoparticle encapsulated mRNA spike protein (recombinant DNA) technologies - the same mRNA nanoparticle technologies found in the COVID-19 ‘vaccines,’ per EcoHealth Alliance’s DEFUSE pitch to DARPA.
In other words, the mRNA technology used to develop the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ is the same technology used to create the pandemic. This is what the US military means by ‘dual-use’ technology.
COVID-19 was not caused by a gain-of-function virus, but by a ‘vaccine’ made from biosynthetic mRNA nanoparticle pathogens (“bat coronaviruses”) that EcoHealth Alliance, Wuhan, and Baric developed using machine learning (Ai).
The ‘vaccine’ that caused COVID-19 are chimeric-weaponized spike proteins that are incorporated into nanoparticles for purposes of ‘vaccinating’ bats, primarily through aerosol inoculation.
In January of 2022, US Marine, Sergeant Jason Murphy, released DARPA documents to Project Veritas. In his cover letter, Sergeant Murphy states; “SARS-CoV-2 is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine.”
2025: What’s the Current Status of the COVID-19 Pandemic and mRNA Injections as a Bioweapons Attack vs. Vaccine Program?
Recently terminated senior advisor to HHS Secretary Kennedy, Dr. Steven Hatfill, played a crucial role in terminating $500 million in HHS funding for mRNA research. During his media appearances, Hatfill asserted that the COVID-19 mRNA injections must recalled shortly after taking his senior leadership role at ASPR (Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response). He also stated that while the mRNA injections are toxic gene-editing technologies, that don’t prevent infection, transmission, or disease, and in fact, cause increased morbidity and mortality, they are not bioweapons.
In his May 2025 interview with Dana Parish, Hatfill stated that he believed that President Trump was putting together a task force to investigate the COVID shots.
Bioweapons Can Be Developed as Part of a Nation’s Biodefense Vaccination Program
In a recent 2-hour interview with Tucker Carlson, U.S. Marine combat veteran, global epidemiologist, and former employee of EcoHealth Alliance employee, Dr. Andrew Huff, states that the Trump administration recently did some great work with Russia to renegotiate the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) treaty (in other words, redefining the term ‘bioweapon.’).
Huff, further explains that the US stance is that under the BWC, a nation can develop gain-of-function bioweapons as long as they are developing the countermeasure to the bioweapon as part of their research;
“They baked a loophole into it to develop countermeasures. That’s vaccine technologies and prophylactics. And you can engage in the gain-of-function technology bioweapon development, if you’re developing the countermeasure.
They couldn’t get anyone to go further past that with having inspections and I don’t see that posture (working), especially today in today’s climate.”
Will There Be a Government Investigation into the COVID-19 Pandemic or the mRNA Nanoparticle Injections?
Huff goes on to state that if there is a government investigation into the COVID-19 pandemic (and I assume the mRNA nanoparticle injections as well), that that would fall under the Department of Defense (DOD) per the US military under the UCMJ (Universal Code for Military Justice), not the Department of Justice (DOJ).
“I’m now at the position of that if this investigation were to take place because the world is in such a tenuous position in terms of the potential for World War III, that that should happen in a classified setting.
And that investigation should be in the form of using the UCMJ process through the Department of Defense because Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Daszak, and Dr. Ralph Barick, all these people are essentially working on a defense program.
They’re working with DOD. It falls under UCMJ authority legally. Not many people know that.
So, people who are working with the DOD, whether they’re a civilian or government employee on a project, Project Defuse, are subject to UCMJ. That’s where the investigation should happen. It shouldn’t happen at the Department of Justice. I believe that Secretary Hegseth has the leadership to execute this properly.” - Dr. Andrew Huff, former EcoHealth Alliance manager
Military Investigations into COVID-19 Would Be Released in 5-10 Years to Avoid WW3
Huff:And if the investigation warrants, then criminal charges could be brought under UCMJ in a classified setting. So basically, a classified trial which exists with set a time period of 5 to 10 years to release the results of that criminal trial publicly.
Huff: Obviously, if someone’s found guilty and they’re imprisoned, you’ll know that there are some wrongdoing, but I don’t think that we’re - (pause) - my greatest concern is that if there were more nefarious components of this, now is not the time to really release that information publicly.
Tucker: Because the world sits on the cusp of a global war.
Huff: Exactly.
Can We Stop the Merger of Ai with Humanity?
Huff goes onto state that ‘there’s no stopping this’ - the merger of Ai and nanotechnology (and the merger of Ai nanotechnology with human beings). Huff explains how the nanotechnology in the cells living species will be programmed and controlled by Ai - this includes you and me - human beings.
“There’s no stopping where’s this is headed.” - Dr. Andrew Huff
Today, American patriots and truthtellers are being presented with the thinly veiled threat that while the COVID-19 pandemic and mRNA nanoparticle injections were developed as bioweapons under a global ‘biodefense program,’ calling them as such and demanding justice would likely lead to WWIII, including the potential use of nuclear weapons.
Nearly 5 years ago, God put on my heart to go on a mission to stop the use of the COVID-19 mRNA injections in children and adults around the world, and to have the shots pulled off the market ASAP.
The most likely outcomes of ‘justice’ we will see is an admission of mistakes and failed oversights during the COVID-19 pandemic and ‘vaccine rollout,’ combined with government and biopharma subsidized compensation for victims.
China (and potentially the U.S.) will admit to deploying ‘aerosolized vaccines’ of SARS-CoV-2 and Omnicron mRNA nanoparticle technologies as a means to ‘protect’ their civilian and military populations, combined with the deployment of the COVID-19 injections and boosters.
Ironically (and tragically), the pursuit of bioweapons accusations is a double-edged sword that implicates many powerful leaders who are both key witnesses to and perpetrators of the global COVID-19 ‘bioweapons defense’ crimes.
Romans 12: 17-19
Repay no one evil for evil. Haveregard for good things in the sight of all men. If it is possible, as much as depends on you, live peaceably with all men.
Beloved - do not avenge yourselves, but rather give place to wrath; for it is written, “Vengeance is Mine, I will repay,” says the Lord.
If You’d Like to Further Support My Work
If you find value in the Kingston Report support my work by subscribing or buying me a coffee (ko-fi). I appreciate you! TRUTH WINS.
