Part 2: ACIP Members Use Data and Scientific Evidence to Dismantle the COVID-19 Propaganda and Lies
September 22, 2025: The expert panel of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunizations Practices (ACIP) exposed the extensive dangers of the COVID-19 injections and the urgent need to correct the false narrative of ‘safe and effective’ around the COVID shots for all the world to view during this past Friday’s meeting.
95% Effective Doesn’t Mean What Billions of People Think It Means
December 4, 2023: Americans and global citizens were intentionally deceived into believing that Pfizer’s 95% efficacy meant that they had a 95% percent reduction in risk of getting infected with the ‘virus’ that causes COVID-19 if they were vaccinated versus not getting vaccinated (doing nothing - placebo).
Clinical topics addressed and debated included the presentation of; aggressive cancers, genetically induced myocarditis, 4-fold increase in birth defects, autoimmune disorders, increased respiratory infections, the persistent production of pathogenic spike protein 700 days out, mRNA and spike protein found in the placenta and breast milk, aggressive cancers, and childhood sudden deaths due to subclinical myocarditis post COVID-19 injection.
“This has to do with acknowledging what the risks are and be truthful to parents and patients and about what are the risks. And these kids die from subclinical myocarditis.”
These are the words of Professor Retsef Levi, PhD, MIT, Chair of the ACIP Work Group on ‘Framing Discussion on the COVID-19 Vaccines’ - also known as informed consent. (below emphasis mine)
“I want all of us to ask, do we have a culture of safety? What would it take for us to acknowledge that there is a problem when at the same time, someone that died two weeks after a positive COVID infection will be considered a Covid associated death, whereas kids that die three days from a known mechanism of the vaccine in their sleep are not counted as vaccine deaths?
I think that, I hope that we all can agree that there is a problem here. And I think we need to think, we need to adopt a more safety culture, that really acknowledge that when there are problems - again, this has nothing to do whether we need to take the vaccine or not - this has to do with acknowledging what the risks are and be truthful to parents and patients and about what are the risks. And these kids die from subclinical myocarditis.
And I want to point out that we have two studies that tested people before and after vaccination. And in both of them, between 2 to 3% of the people that took the vaccine had hallmark biomarker of a heart damage and heart attack.”
In other words, had the CDC and FDA ignored their fiduciary duty to the American people to ensure that the COVID vaccines were safe? and effective? Or did they use propaganda in lieu of facts and evidence and in clear violation of the rules and laws that regulate the agency?
The CDC Does Not Acknowledge Safety Concerns and Regulatory Violations
Professor Levi began his presentation with the clear statements, “Working group members felt the CDC currently does not appropriately acknowledge several safety concerns and uncertainties and multiple documented unintended mechanism of actions of the mRNA vaccines and seemingly regulatory violations.”
The Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials Showed Harm
Professor Levi repeatedly shared documents and clinical publications addressing the incidence of myocarditis and death in patients who were injected.
Levi made the bold and truthful statement that the data from the manufacturer’s FDA randomized clinical trials “did not show benefits for all causes of mortality and all causes of hospitalization, and in fact, there is some evidence to show that they caused harm in that respect.”
Radical Transparency is Urgently Needed
I’ve reviewed Friday’s 6 and 1/2 hour meeting several times, and there is a lot to unpack and share. The consistent message I took away from each and every presentation and discussion group (debate) was that the CDC, the FDA, and the manufactures:
Failed to present factual data to the American people,
Failed to ensure safe formulations and manufacturing, and
Failed to disclose known and unknown risks of the COVID-19 mRNA injections.
The majority of the ACIP members believe Americans need to know the full truth about the COVID-19 mRNA injections. Chairman Dr. Martin Kulldorf at one point stated that he felt confident that the new CDC will be updating their information to reflect most, if not all the risks associated with the COVID-19 shots addressed in the meeting.
One of the first steps is updating the current Vaccine Information Sheet (VIS) for COVID-19.
Here’s copy of the current COVID-19 VIS.
3 out of 4 of the COVID-19 Vaccine Policies ACIP Voted on Were for Informed Consent Based on Clinical Evidence
While members of various medical associations called in to accuse the ACIP members of creating policies based on propaganda and not evidence, Dr. Levi respectfully corrected this false perception.
“First of all, I believe that it's appropriate and actually necessary that ACIP will think about vaccination policies and related issues in a broader sense than just focus on a very specifically narrowed question of whether to, and how to recommend one, one vaccine or another. That's within the charter of the ACIP. I actually looked into this.
Secondly, as much as I understand ‘the trust.’ I mean we all trust the CDC, but the fact of the matter is that the current VIS (vaccine information sheet) of the COVID 19 vaccine does not reflect the current risks as we discussed today, by no means.
So, I think it's important to make that statement.
And I think that all the risks that are articulated there were formulated, or the issues were formulated after deep literature review and deliberation about what the evidence suggests.
I also, when we think about communicating to patients, we don't need to wait until there is this absolutely 100% of evidence of harm. We need to be transparent about the risks and uncertainties that we have. And if we don't know something or we suspect something or we have missing information that should be communicated to them. And just an example is something that Dr. Meissner, you mentioned, like our understanding of what protection this vaccine is giving to different people is very lacking to say the least. And it's based on low quality evidence.
We need to be honest and transparent about this.
I think that the evidence suggests that we have not been that way and I think that we as ACIP, we should call it out and make a very explicit statement about that. I think it's not only appropriate, I think it's actually something that is in the core mission of what we are supposed to do.
Questions into how these harms were ignored by the CDC, FDA and manufactures and who was responsible were not only raised, but they were also directly asked.
Please stay connected. There is much more good news to report on.
Romans 5: 2-5
And we boast in the hope of the glory of God. Not only so, but we also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not put us to shame, because God’s love has been poured out into our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us.
If You’d Like to Further Support My Work
Mail: Karen Kingston - 1700 Aviara Parkway, #130063 - Carlsbad, CA 92013
