The first reason is that the recent news cycle has been absolute chaos and I didn’t want to be part of the social media feed of mostly theatrical performances that go nowhere, rehash battles we already lost and are emotionally draining.
Relevant, Timely Reporting Can Save Lives
Over the past several weeks, I’ve done intense research and analysis to determine what government actions, policies, violations and data are of value to know at this time.
I am thankful that Kingston Report subscribers’ value the timely importance of my research and findings, as is evidenced by my reports being suppressed for months or even years - sometimes to be later considered ‘breaking news’ by another expert.
In this short clip from July 2021, I review the reports of the poisoning of infants from nursing mothers who were injected with Pfizer’s mRNA shots and how Pfizer’s mRNA injections increase the risk of miscarriage from 20% to 80% in pregnant women.
Make no mistake, suppressing relevant timely reporting is a form of deception.
Imagine if my Pfizer research on the alarming study protocols and devastating effects of mRNA nanoparticles on the female reproductive system which I released publicly in July of 2021 hadn’t been suppressed for over a year?
Why Didn’t Pfizer’s IND Pregnancy Protocols, VAERS Data, and Warnings Go Viral with Health Freedom Platforms in 2021?
Many Health Freedom leaders (not all, but many) were discussing ‘unknown’ risks to pregnant women in 2021, despite the overwhelming body of evidence from that was available from peer-reviewed publications, VAERS, Pfizer’s IND, FOIA’d documents, and patents, demonstrating that the mRNA technology is so dangerous to women of childbearing age, that they should not even be in contact with anyone who was injected.
“So, occupational exposure. This is what’s really strange. If someone is a health care professional and basically what happens is…They get in contact with a woman prior to or just around the time of conception.
If you were injected with a vaccine but you are around someone who was going to get pregnant soon or just got pregnant, that person is at risk.”- Karen Kingston
Brannon Howse: This also talks about how if you are a male participant, who’s receiving the study intervention...
“That just explains what I just said, like skin contact, but you have to report it within 24 hours if you were exposed.
If EDP (exposure during pregnancy) occurs in a participant or a participant’s partner, the investigator must report this information to Pfizer Safety, SAE (serious adverse event) Report Form and an EDP Supplemental Form, regardless of whether the SAE has occurred. Details of the pregnancy will be collected after the start of the study intervention and until 6 months after the last dose of the intervention.
“It goes on to say that, what it could result in is a miscarriage, birth defect, or neonatal death within one month. So, that’s what could happen…” -Karen Kingston
In April of 2021, the FDA paused the authorization of J&J’s COVID-19 vaccine due to 6 reported cases of thrombosis-thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS). I believe the executive leadership at J&J had strong influence over the FDA’s decision for numerous reasons, including the fact that Pfizer had much higher reported rates of TTS and J&J disposed of 60 million doses in June of 2021. J&J never sought FDA approval, eventually removing their COVID-19 injections off the America.
I believe the body of evidence available in early-mid 2021 could have resulted in having the mRNA injections removed from the market if the Health Freedom Movement had been unified behind the evidence and strategically directed to insist on their removal as part of their media talking points.
“Make it Choice” Could Only Survive by Suppressing Publicly Accessible Data and Manipulating the Code of Federal Regulations
If our experts and leaders believed that the mRNA injections provided no clinical benefit and posed great risks to adults, children, and pregnant women for disease, disabilities and/or death, then the ‘make it choice’ narrative that heavily promoted from 2021-2022, was confusing to those who knew the FDA violated dozens of safety regulations for an FDA approved or authorized product, and convincing to those who were injected that they made the right choice.
As of today, there are no signs that the mRNA gene-editing nanoparticle technology will ever be removed from the market. In fact, recent government policies and actions indicate rapid expanded use of mRNA and nanotechnology in general. I’ve done intense research and analysis to determine what government actions, policies, violations and data are of value to know at this time.
Finding the Upside of Being Struck with Health Issues
The second reason I have not been reporting recently is that the day after I recorded this interview, I came down with some health issues similar to the ones that erupted over the past couple years. The good news is that this time I experienced some unexpected side effects from my treatments.
Why is this good news? Because I looked into some commonly recommended medications that have been safely used for decades and discovered new warnings and data confirming significant increased risks for serious adverse events for adults like you and me. I’ll be reporting on these findings over the next couple weeks as well.
My goal is to provide you with news that is useful and can help you navigate these chaotic times with confidence, compassion and encouragement.
Thank you for supporting me over the years. I appreciate you!
With love and gratitude - Karen Kingston
Exodus 23: 1-3
“Do not spread false reports. Do not help a guilty person by being a malicious witness. Do not follow the crowd in doing wrong. When you give testimony in a lawsuit, do not pervert justice by siding with the crowd...”
Yes I remember reading that information. It definitely should have been stopped back then.