June 25, 2026: I sat down with USA Watchdog - Greg Hunter to do a deep dive on the FDA submitted safety and efficacy data of Moderna’s mRNA flu injection versus currently licensed enhanced flu vaccines from GSK and Sanofi.
Thank you Brian. I am going to be diving back into nanotechnology soon. It's so important to understand this attack on our 'humanness' and not to consciously or unconsciously to allow our human traits be taken over by nanotech.
Karen: I fear you misunderstand the meaning of "safe and effective." Safe means "we think we can get away with marketing poisoning because we have a cover story good enough to survive legal scrutiny. Effective means likely to harm a lot of people without causing undue alarm and make us a lot of money by continuing our program of bamboozling the people and the scientific community with our cleverly spun data. It also means we have run it through A.I. and A.I. thinks we can sell it at profit without incurring legal liability.
LOL. I agree with you with Mark. The business model of the fox guarding the henhouse would be safer than the current FDA policies for 'safe and effective' vaccines.
Great job on USA Watchdog again Karen. I did the math and it makes me wonder if each of the more than 50 flu shots that I took, being a physician were harmful to me?
Both the mRNA jab and the active comparator jab would more than double the number of flu deaths. The antigens in each year's flu shot is not tested in humans. As you pointed out in this and a previous podcast, the FDA-Vaccine complex now will switch out antigens and do the testing later. This is a depopulation agenda and more.
This is the Pfizer document link for their new mRNA flu shot.
58,000,000X0.0019657=114,010 deaths instead of 45,000 deaths
58,000,000X0.00167043=96,885. deaths instead of 45,000 deaths.
Both of these jabs are worse than just relying on your own immune system. They increase your risk of death by flu.
The experts on the committee voted 9-0 to recommend approval of the mRNA flu shot. The FDA approved the COVID jab and I expect that they will approve this one too.
Perhaps we should look at the real agenda....
Repurposed C-19 vax: From study S003991402500133X; "Therefore, expired vaccines
... SARS-CoV2-S protein can be repurposed for biosensing application and provide
a use, even though they are past their expiration date for vaccination." End quote
Decode: Biosensors are analytical devices (nano-tech) that convert the biological
response into an electrical signal connecting you to the Cyborg Internet of Bodies.
Source: revelation1823.net
Thank you, Karen!
Thank you Brian. I am going to be diving back into nanotechnology soon. It's so important to understand this attack on our 'humanness' and not to consciously or unconsciously to allow our human traits be taken over by nanotech.
Karen, you know I greatly respect you!
If you get a chance, check out my work.... revelation1823.net
In my feeble way, I tried my best to connect the cartel of Big Pharma to scripture and warn humanity while they are still on this side of the dirt!
Really not trying to push my book, but the moral implications of our salvation in the context of nanotech cannot be ignored any longer.
Be blessed, my friend
Karen: I fear you misunderstand the meaning of "safe and effective." Safe means "we think we can get away with marketing poisoning because we have a cover story good enough to survive legal scrutiny. Effective means likely to harm a lot of people without causing undue alarm and make us a lot of money by continuing our program of bamboozling the people and the scientific community with our cleverly spun data. It also means we have run it through A.I. and A.I. thinks we can sell it at profit without incurring legal liability.
LOL. I agree with you with Mark. The business model of the fox guarding the henhouse would be safer than the current FDA policies for 'safe and effective' vaccines.
Great job on USA Watchdog again Karen. I did the math and it makes me wonder if each of the more than 50 flu shots that I took, being a physician were harmful to me?
Both the mRNA jab and the active comparator jab would more than double the number of flu deaths. The antigens in each year's flu shot is not tested in humans. As you pointed out in this and a previous podcast, the FDA-Vaccine complex now will switch out antigens and do the testing later. This is a depopulation agenda and more.
This is the Pfizer document link for their new mRNA flu shot.
https://www.fda.gov/media/193131/download
Pages 15-16 says 45,000 American died from flu in 2024-25.
Table 2: Study 304 Participant Disposition (Randomization Set)
on page 34 gives the deaths from the Pfizer jab and the active comparison jab.
mRNA jab 40 of 20,349 died ratio of 0.0019657
Other active flu jab 34 of 20,354 died ratio of 0.00167043
They did not compare their jab to a placebo.
What if every American, 65 and older injected one of these flu shots?
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=number+of+Americans+65+and+older&t=osx&ia=web
There are 58 million of us old people.
58,000,000X0.0019657=114,010 deaths instead of 45,000 deaths
58,000,000X0.00167043=96,885. deaths instead of 45,000 deaths.
Both of these jabs are worse than just relying on your own immune system. They increase your risk of death by flu.
The experts on the committee voted 9-0 to recommend approval of the mRNA flu shot. The FDA approved the COVID jab and I expect that they will approve this one too.